Issues at the California DMV for Out-of-State Drivers - DUI Law and Legal Information
Request Free Consultation with a DUI Attorney
For more information about driving under the influence or drunk driving, please contact our office today!
Complete the form and a lawyer or representative from The Law Office of Robert Tayac will contact you shortly.
The transmission of this e-mail inquiry regarding a California DUI or DMV case or any other legal matter does not create an attorney-client relationship with any lawyer or lawyers of The Law Office of Robert Tayac. The only way to create an attorney-client relationship with any lawyer or lawyers of this law firm is by signing a written legal services agreement and complying with its terms.
Many drivers licensed in other states don't realize that a California DUI arrest can create consequences at both the California Department of Motor Vehicles and in their licensing state. The home state may learn of the arrest through the Interstate Driver's License Compact.
Although the California DMV cannot revoke an out-of-state license, because it is considered the property of another state, it can suspend a driver's privileges within the state as well as notify the licensing state. The driver's best option to avoid these repercussions is to fight suspension at the California DMV hearing. An experienced California DUI defense attorney can help accused motorists protect a driving privileges both in California and in the licensing state.
Call 415-552-6000 for a Free Consultation
Our California DUI law office provides free consultations.
Attorneys for this DUI law firm represent clients accused of driving under the influence of alcohol or driving with a blood or breath alcohol level at or above the legal limit in San Francisco, San Mateo, Marin, Alameda, Santa Clara, Contra Costa, Sonoma and Napa counties
Feel free to contact our office today!
The Interstate Driver's License Compact, or IDLC, is an interstate compact used by States of the United States to exchange information concerning license suspensions and traffic violations of non-residents and forward them to the state where they are licensed known as the home state. Its theme is One Driver, One License, One Record. The home state would treat the offense as if it had been committed at home, applying home state laws to the out-of-state offense. The action taken would include, but not be limited to, points assessed on a minor offense such as speeding and suspension of license or a major violation such as DUI / DWI.
All states are members except for Michigan, Wisconsin, Georgia, Tennessee (dropped out in 1997), and Massachusetts. Whether the remaining states will act after being notified of an arrest depends on the state.
Some states have an administrative system similar to California Administrative Per Se (APS) hearing, and may acknowledge an APS suspension even without a criminal court conviction. States without an administrative system may require a court conviction before they will take any action against a driver's privileges.
Drivers fear that a California DUI arrest will create a terrible impact on their lives, but it’s possible to reduce the consequences of a drunk driving arrest. A California criminal defense attorney with experience defending DUI and DMV cases will provide information about the driver's home state licensing policies, and aggressively challenge a California DMV hearing.
Note: Laws and legal procedures mentioned on "BayAreaDUIDefense.com" are constantly changing. As a result, any statute, law, or procedure may have changed as a result of recently enacted drunk driving laws, judicial court decisions, or California DMV license suspension rules, policies or procedures. Thus, the information provided here should not be relied upon as legal advice. To be certain, you should always obtain legal representation and advice from a California DUI defense attorney, or criminal defense lawyer with extensive, experience in California DUI Defense, who is familiar with the facts unique to your DUI case.
DLC1 - This is a list of states that belong to the Driver License Compact. An agreement between these states basically says you have only ONE drivers license record.
NRVC2 - This is a list of the Non Resident Violator Compact. A list of states that communicate with one another if you get a ticket out of your home state.
The Interstate Driver's License Compact
| DLC1 - NRVC2 Compact Member Joined Dates |
| DLC1 |
Effective Date |
NRVC2 |
Effective Date |
| Alabama |
1966 |
Alabama |
October 1981 |
| Alaska |
September 1986 |
Alaska |
Not a Member |
| Arizona |
1963 |
Arizona |
January 1993 |
| Arkansas |
1969 |
Arkansas |
January 1986 |
| California |
1963 |
California |
Not a Member |
| Colorado |
1965 |
Colorado |
January 1982 |
| Connecticut |
January 1993 |
Connecticut |
January 1981 |
| Delaware |
1964 |
Delaware |
February 1979 |
| District of Columbia |
November 1985 |
District of Columbia |
August 1980 |
| Florida |
1967 |
Florida |
October 1981 |
| Georgia |
Not a Member |
Georgia |
February 1980 |
| Hawaii |
1971 |
Hawaii |
January 1996 |
| Idaho |
1963 |
Idaho |
October 1992 |
| Illinois |
1963 |
Illinois |
July 1984 |
| Indiana |
1967 |
Indiana |
January 1980 |
| Iowa |
1965 |
Iowa |
November 1980 |
| Kansas |
1965 |
Kansas |
January 1983 |
| Kentucky |
August 1996 |
Kentucky |
December 1978 |
| Louisiana |
1968 |
Louisiana |
November 1979 |
| Maine |
1963 |
Maine |
January 1982 |
| Maryland |
1978 |
Maryland |
July 1979 |
| Massachusetts |
Not a Member |
Massachusetts |
December 1987 |
| Michigan |
Not a Member |
Michigan |
Not a Member |
| Minnesota |
1990 |
Minnesota |
October 1978 |
| Mississippi |
1962 |
Mississippi |
March 1979 |
| Missouri |
October 1985 |
Missouri |
October 1980 |
| Montana |
1963 |
Montana |
Not a Member |
| Nebraska |
1963 |
Nebraska |
January 1982 |
| Nevada |
1961 |
Nevada |
February 1990 |
| New Hampshire |
October 1986 |
New Hampshire |
January 1982 |
| New Jersey |
1966 |
New Jersey |
July 1983 |
| New Mexico |
1963 |
New Mexico |
January 1985 |
| New York |
1965 |
New York |
June 1982 |
| North Carolina |
September 1993 |
North Carolina |
September 1980 |
| North Dakota |
May 1986 |
North Dakota |
July 1980 |
| Ohio |
October 1987 |
Ohio |
January 1985 |
| Oklahoma |
1967 |
Oklahoma |
July 1987 |
| Oregon |
1963 |
Oregon |
Not a Member |
| Pennsylvania |
October 1994 |
Pennsylvania |
July 1979 |
| Rhode Island |
January 1987 |
Rhode Island |
April 1986 |
| South Carolina |
August 1987 |
South Carolina |
January 1981 |
| South Dakota |
November 1987 |
South Dakota |
May 1980 |
| Tennessee |
'65/'97 dropped out |
Tennessee |
September 1984 |
| Texas |
September 1993 |
Texas |
January 1982 |
| Utah |
1965 |
Utah |
July 1985 |
| Vermont |
October 1987 |
Vermont |
October 1985 |
| Virginia |
1963 |
Virginia |
July 1980 |
| Washington |
1963 |
Washington |
October 1993 |
| West Virginia |
July 1972 |
West Virginia |
July 1978 |
| Wisconsin |
Not a Member |
Wisconsin |
Not a Member |
| Wyoming |
May 1987 |
Wyoming |
July 1987 |
| Note: The Law Office of Robert Tayac assumes no liability for any use of "BayAreaDUIDefense.com" as it is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to be legal advice. |
|